The High Court held that the present Family Court Appeal is not maintainable as the substantive appeals filed by the parties have been admitted. Issues on merits remain open. The accompanying Civil Application was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 fca-141-15
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. Manish B. Katira, appellant-in-person present. Mr. Abhay Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Arun Mehta, Sonika Mehta, Mayur S. Kadam i/by Akshar Laws for respondent.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND M. S. SONAK, JJ .
January 06, 2016.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that Family Court Appeal Nos. 99, 101 and 108 of 2015 filed by respondent and Family Court Appeal No.114 of 2015 filed by the present appellant are admitted.
Present appeal is filed by the appellant arises out of impugned order dated 3/6/2015 in M.A. No. 88 of 2012. The appellant moved an
2/2 fca-141-15
application under the Contempt of Courts Act, on which the court passed the impugned order rejecting the said application.
As the substantive appeals filed by the parties have been admitted, we are of the view that the present Family Court Appeal is not maintainable.
Keeping all the issues on merits open, present appeal is disposed of.
Civil Application No. 335 of 2015 does not survive and same is disposed of as such.
(M. S. SONAK , J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court Appeal is maintainable since the substantive appeals filed by the parties have been admitted.
Whether the Civil Application survives and needs to be disposed of.
Appellant-in-person
Respondent
NARESH H. PATIL
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
