Chamber summons in testamentary proceedings to condone delay in filing a caveat was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the caveator nor her advocate was present in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912-CST37-16.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 37 OF 2016
IN
CAVEAT (L) NO. 314 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1330 OF 2014
Dr. Vijay Gopal Kulkarni & 2 Others
Versus
Mrs. Manisha Dilip Kulkarni
...Petitioners
…Caveator
None present.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:6th April 2016
PC:-
1.None for the Petitioners. The Chamber Summons is to
condone the delay in filing a Caveat. Neither the Caveator nor her
Advocate are present in Court, though their names are correctly
shown on board and are called out.
2.The Chamber Summons is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Dr. Vijay Gopal Kulkarni & 2 Others
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court