Sudhir Pralhad Barge v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crpil-57.13.sxw
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.57 OF 2013
Shri Sudhir Pralhad Barge … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P. D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 26th APRIL, 2016
P.C.
. As per the order dated 7th April, 2015 amendment is not carried out till today. No steps are taken for effecting service of notice to the sixth Respondent. By way of indulgence, we extend the time to carry out amendment by a period of four weeks from today. We grant time of four weeks to the Petitioner to take steps for effecting service of notice to the sixth Respondent. If compliance is not made within the stipulated time, the Petition to stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.
1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shri Sudhir Pralhad Barge
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
A.S. Oka
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court