the Petitioner is an independent centric petition and in such a petition, it cannot be said that there is any interest of public at large. Thirdly, this Court cannot entertain any individual centric petitions as per the law laid down by the Supreme Court in catena of cases. The principle behind filing of public interest litigation is that whenever a class of people or individuals are unable to approach this Court on account of economic, social or other disabilities, then in such cases, on their behalf, their representative can come before this Court or before the Apex Court and then the Apex Court or this Court can entertain such petition filed on behalf of such persons as public interest litigation. In a PIL, therefore, under certain circumstances, the principle of locus standi is given a go bye and it is made an exception to the general rule. Ordinarily, in every litigation, a litigant can approach the Court and seek a legal remedy. While doing so, however, such an aggrieved person is bound by the statements which he makes in his petition. If he obtains any interim orders, he has to give an undertaking to the Court that in the event, the interim order is vacated and loss is caused to the Respondent on account of the interim order, then he will face the costs and consequences for having obtained the interim orders. We find that number of cases are being filed for various reasons, in which public interest is not involved and these matters take valuable time of the
