Disposed

M/S. Mariegold Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Mr. Mukund Subhash Karwa and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Mar 2016CRA/347/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a Civil Revision Application challenging a lower court order, noting the associated interim order had stayed proceedings since December 2013.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Application allowed to be withdrawn. Trial court directed to decide pending interim relief as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 3 months.

M/S. Mariegold Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1/3 CRA/347/2014

¶2

Tapadia RR/B.8

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 347 OF 2014 WITH

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.501 OF 2015

¶5

Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders. Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina a/w Mr. Rohan Cama i/b S. S. Kanetkar, Advocates for Applicants.

¶7

Ms. Priya Ranade a/w Ms Triveni Jani i/b M/s Markand Gandhi & Co, Advocates for Respondents no. 1 to 8.

¶8

CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 07/03/2016

¶9

PC:

¶10

Heard Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms. Priya Ranade, learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 8.

¶11

By this Application under Section 115 of C.P.C, the applicants, hereinafter referred to as defendants no. 1 to 6, have challenged the judgment and order dated 9.4.2014 passed by the learned 3^rd Addl. Civil Judge, Sr. Dn.,Pune below Exhibits 29 and 31 in Spl. Civil Suit No.1713 of

¶12

2/3 CRA/347/2014

¶13

By that order, the learned trial Judge rejected the applications.

¶14

Mr. Andhyarujina, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this Application.

¶15

Ms Ranade has no objection. She further submits that respondents no.1 to 8 have taken out application for interim order in December, 2013 and because of interim order operating in this application, proceedings before the trial Court are stayed. She, therefore, submitted that the learned trial Judge may be directed to dispose of application for interim relief in a time bound manner. Mr.Andhyarujina has no objection.

¶16

In view thereof, on the application made by Mr. Andhyarujian, Civil Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn.

¶17

Since the application for interim relief is pending from December, 2013, the learned trial Judge is requested to decide the same as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 3 months

¶18

3/3 CRA/347/2014

¶19

from production of the authenticated copy of this order.

¶20

In view of disposal of Civil Revision Application, Civil Application No. 501 of 2015 for modification of order dated 30.4.2014 does not survive and same is disposed of.

¶21

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)

M/S. Mariegold Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Mr. Mukund Subhash Karwa and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Mariegold Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Mr. Mukund Subhash Karwa and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Ganesh Sanjew Shetti Vs the Assistant Commissioner and Licensing Authority, Food and Durg Admn. and Ors.

Shri. Limbaji Dhondiba Sargar Vs the Assistant Commissioner and Licensing Authority, Food and Durg Admn. and Ors.

Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. Vs M/S. Sanghi Overseas

Shri Vilas Ramchadnra Shinde Vs Smt. Sashi v. Sachdev

Sion Kamgar Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs Dr. Atul Pundalik Chirmade and Ors.

M/S. Mariegold Infratech Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs Mr. Mukund Subhash Karwa and Ors.