Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a Company Petition after disputing was settled out of court. The High Court, noting the petition was not yet admitted, granted leave and dismissed the proceeding.
Leave to withdraw the Company Petition granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.cp.942.2014.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 942 OF 2014
Aranex India Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner vs Quantium Mati, Logistics Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr P. Ranjan i/b Halai & Co. for the Petitioner None for the Respondent.
CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA J.
JUNE 21, 2016
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner states that the disputes in the Company Petition have been settled out of Court and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the same.
2 In view of the aforesaid statement and considering the
fact that the Company Petition has not yet been admitted or advertised, leave is granted and the Company Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
( B. P. COLABAWALLA J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Aranex India Pvt. Ltd.
Quantium Mati, Logistics Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd.
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
