The Company Court disposed of the petition by accepting a Compromise Deed, marking the company petition as withdrawn with no substantive ruling recorded.
Petition disposed as withdrawn; Compromise Deed taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP81.14-1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.81 OF 2014
M/s.Kanohar Electricals Ltd.
….Petitioner
V/s.
Aspen Infrastructures Limited
....Respondent
Mr.Jayesh Gawde for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashwin Shete i/by Jaykar & Partners for the respondent.
Mr.R.R.Belgundi, Regional Sales Manager-Marketing (Petitioner) present.
Representative Mr.Pankaj Lohey-Asstt. General Manager for respondent present.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 18.1.2016
P.C.:-
1 The parties have entered into a Compromise Deed dated 18.1.2016. The same, signed by the authorized signatory of the petitioner, respondent and their respective Advocates, are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2 Order in terms of the Compromise Deed. The petition is disposed as withdrawn.
3 Shri Jayesh Gawde counsel for the petitioner states that he is filing his Vakalatnama during the course of today. Registry to accept the same.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
CP81.14-1
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
KJ
M/s. Kanohar Electricals Ltd.
Aspen Infrastructures Limited
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
