The court disposed of a contempt petition where respondents tendered an apology. The petitioner agreed to the satisfaction based on exhibited compliance pages.
Contempt proceeding purged; petition disposed; petitioner permitted to withdraw deposited amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.695 OF 2016 (Maroti Waghmare Vs.Shivaji Pawar and another) IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4739 OF 2013
Mr.G.J.Karne, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.N.T.Bhagat, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr.G.R.Jadhav h/f Mr.A.D.Raut, Advocate for respondent No.2.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
DATE : 21/12/2016
PER COURT :
khs/DEC.2016/695-d
2
the petition is disposed of.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/DEC.2016/695-d
Maroti Waghmare
Shivaji Pawar
another
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
