In a contempt petition filed for non-payment of wages, the respondent advocated payment of Rs.1,25,000 via cheque. Upon tender and acceptance of the cheque, the court was satisfied with compliance and disposed of the petition.
Contempt Petition disposed of as respondent tendered cheque meeting the condition of compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1.cp.563.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 563 OF 2016
IN WP/2531/2011
DEELIP UTTAMRAO BHOSAL E
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Choudhary S.S. AGP for Respondents 1 and 4 : Shri N.T.Bhagat Advocate for Respondents 2, 5 and 6 : Shri Thombre S.S. a/w Shri M.S.Karad.
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATE :- 19th December, 2016
Per Court:
1 It had transpired on 09.12.2016 that if Respondent Nos.2, 5
and 6 pay a lump-sum amount of Rs.1,25,000/- towards unpaid wages, the Petitioner would seek disposal of this Contempt Petition.
2 The learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.2, 5 and 6 has tendered the cheque dated 09.12.2016 in the name of the Petitioner for an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- (Rupees One Lac Twenty Five Thousand). The photocopy of the cheque is taken on record and the cheque is handed over to the learned Advocate for the Petitioner.
2
1.cp.563.16
3 The learned Advocate for the Petitioner accepts the cheque
and submits, on instructions, that since there is compliance of the order at issue, the Petitioner is satisfied and this Contempt Petition can, therefore, be disposed of.
4 Considering the above, this Contempt Petition is disposed of.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
kps
DEELIP UTTAMRAO BHOSAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
