This single-judge order dismissed a company petition as withdrawn after the parties settled the dispute out of court by executing consent terms to be tendered before an arbitrator.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 445-2015.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 445 OF 2015
Gulshan Fashions Pvt.Ltd. …Petitioner vs. Pantaloons Fashion & Ratail Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr.Kersi Dastoor I/b. Phoenix Legal for Petitioner. Mr.Kunal Bhanage for Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
22 NOVEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties through their authorized representatives and also by their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel inform the court that the disputes between the parties, which form part of the company petition, have been settled out of court. The Consent Terms are executed between the parties, which will be tendered before the sole arbitrator, who is hearing an arbitration reference between the parties. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition in view of these Consent Terms. A copy of the Consent Terms executed between the parties is tendered by learned Counsel. The same is taken on record, marked “X” for identification.
2 The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Gulshan Fashions Pvt.Ltd.
Pantaloons Fashion & Retail Ltd.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
