The single judge disposed of the contempt petition after the respondent filed an affidavit complying with the court's direction. The related civil application also stood disposed of.
Contempt Petition disposed; recall notice in Form-I withdrawn; Civil Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 7837 OF 2014
(Prakash Mahadeo Ekbote and another Vs. Shailesh Nawal
and another)
Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No. 1
Mr. A.B. Girase, Govt. Pleader for respondent No. 2
CORAM :R.M. BORDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 18th November, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
2.An additional affidavit-in-reply has been
presented on behalf of respondent No. 1. The same is
taken on record. It is recorded in the affidavit-in-
reply that the direction issued by this Court has been
complied with.
3.In view of the affidavit tendered by respondent
No. 1, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. The
notice issued on 30th September, 2016 in Form-I, Rule 26
of Chapter-XXXIV of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side
Rules, 1960, is recalled.
2
cp443-2015
4.In view of disposal of the Contempt Petition,
Civil Application No. 14882 of 2016 does not survive and
hence, stands disposed of.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL][R.M. BORDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
npj/cp443-2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition should be disposed of given the compliance of the court's direction by the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash Mahadeo Ekbote
Shailesh Nawal
R.M. Borde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court