Petitioners applied to withdraw the company petition alleging amicable resolution. The High Court allowed the withdrawal on costs being no order passed.
Withdrawal of the company petition allowed; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Vikrant
2-CP-44-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 44 OF 2015
Mr. Taral Bharat Sheth and Another ... Petitioners
Versus
Sunny Vista Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U70100mh2006ptc161689 ... Respondent
Mr. H. Nagi with Ms. Chaula Solanki i/b. H H Nagi and Associates for the Petitioners.
Ms. Shreya Gupta i/b. Bharucha & Partners for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 06, 2016.
P.C.:
Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the matter has been amicably resolved and he has the instructions to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, on his application, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Mr. Taral Bharat Sheth and Another
Sunny Vista Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
