Consent terms were tendered and accepted by the Court, leading to the disposal of Company Petition No. 411 of 2015 without costs.
Petition disposed of on consent terms; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 411-2015.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 411 OF 2015
Muskan Enterprises …Petitioner vs. Global Composites and Structurals Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr.Bruno Castellino for Petitioner. Mr.Haresh Menghani for Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
30 NOVEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties, through their authorised signatories, and also by their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the company petition in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked “X” for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Muskan Enterprises
Global Composites and Structurals Ltd.
S.C. GupTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
