High Court dismissed Company Petition (L) 1038 of 2015 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the date fixed for withdrawal and subsequent hearing before the Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CPL-1038-15.doc
rsk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION (L) NO.1038 OF 2015
M/s. Capital First Ltd. ...Petitioner vs. Padma Flashlights Pvt. Ltd. CIN No.UMHPTC ...Respondent
None for the petitioner and the respondent.
CORAM : B.P. COLABAWALLA, J. DATE : JUNE 29, 2016.
P.C.:
. This matter was shown on board for withdrawal on
22/6/2016. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In this view of the matter it was therefore adjourned to 27/6/2016 under the caption “For withdrawal”. Even on 27/6/2016, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and therefore the matter was placed today on board for dismissal. Even today none appears on behalf of the petitioner. In this view of the matter the Company Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.)
1 of 1
M/s. Capital First Ltd.
Padma Flashlights Pvt. Ltd.
B.P. COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
