Petitioner would be justified in making allegations against the office of the Corporation. This Court had asked the Corporation to take action in accordance with law. No doubt though the order is dated 29th January, 2016, the Corporation initiated proceedings in 30th April, 2016, and there was a delay of 8 weeks. It is expected that for some reasons the orders passed by this Court are not complied within stipulated time. It is duty of the authorities to approach the Court and seek extension of time for carrying out the directions. Prima facie, we are of the view that petition / PIL was pursued by the Petitioner in an adversarial manner and not in public interest. The Petitioner should have been satisfied that the wheels of law are set in motion by him. But it appears that he is not satisfied by the process, which is set in motion, but wants to hound and pursue the Corporation and the person, who has allegedly made unauthorised construction. Taking into consideration all these facts, we are not inclined to issue contempt notice to the Corporation. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed.
