The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a contempt petition, having obtained the desired relief. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the contempt petition granted; the petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO. 23272 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2012 OF 2014
M/s. Powar & Sons
… Petitioner
Versus
Ld. District Collector of Kolhapur
… Respondents
Mr. Manoj Patil for the petitioner.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : JULY 25, 2016.
P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this contempt petition as according to him the contempt petition has rendered infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submission, Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
M/s. Powar & Sons
Ld. District Collector of Kolhapur
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
