The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Contempt Petition upon the submission that the earlier order regarding a miscellaneous business decision was complied with and challenged in a separate writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp23.12.sxw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2012
Shri Bhosage S.R. ... Petitioner V/s. Shri Sanjay Kumar Secretary, Department of Higher Education ... Respondent
Mr. S.G. Kudle i/b. Mr. V.V. Purwant for the petitioner. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND M.S. SONAK, JJ . 4th January, 2016 .
P.C.
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned AGP submits that the order passed on 6th April, 2011 by the Division Bench of this Court (Coram: A.M. Khanwilkar and Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ) has been complied with and the decision has been communicated to the petitioner. The Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that said decision has been challenged in the writ petition bearing no. 1673/2013. Learned Counsel, therefore, prays that this Contempt Petition may be disposed of. The same is accordingly disposed of.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Shri Bhosage S.R.
Shri Sanjay Kumar
NARESH H. PATIL
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
