Anil Madhavrao Solanke and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCP/215/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad refused to entertain a contempt petition due to the significant lapse of approximately eight years since the impugned orders were issued in 2008 and 2010, thus not disposing of the matter. However, the court directed the respondent authority to decide the pending appeals within the stipulated or extended time.
What did the court decide?
The petition was disposed of; the Additional Tribal Commissioner was directed to decide pending appeals within the granted or extended time frame.