The court examined an auditor's report regarding the petitioner's pay-scale fitment issue. Finding disputed questions of fact appropriate for separate civil proceedings, the court held the contempt proceedings were disposed of while reserving rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP193-13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Contempt Petition No.193/2013 in Writ Petition No.988/2006 (D)
( Sadiq Shafi Qureshi .vs. Mr. Amarlal Daulatani, Ex.Director and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Petitioner in person. Mr. C.S. Samudra, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : February 2, 2016.
2
CP193-13.odt
to such remedy as is available to him in law. 3. The proceedings are, therefore, disposed of reserving the rights of the petitioner as are permissible in law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether discrepancies in auditor's report warrant setting aside previous order under contempt proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sadiq Shafi Qureshi
Mr. Amarlal Daulatani
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
