A contempt petition was disposed of because the Respondent-State withdrew the recovery letter that was the subject of the proceeding, causing the petition not to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP. 149-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 149 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION No. 915 OF 2012
Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. … Petitioners Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/b Uday P. Warunjikar, for the Petitioners. Mr. Mahindra Agwekar i/b Mandar Limaye, for Respondents No. 4. Mr. P. P. Kakade, AGP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MAY 3 , 2016
PC.
. We are informed by the learned AGP that the Respondent-State have already withdrawn the letter of recovery dated 7th July, 2014. Hence, contempt petition does not survive and is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/Sd/[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Mahavir Roads & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
