The Bench disposed of Company Petition No. 1053 of 2015 based on consent terms signed by both parties and the petitioner's advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP1053.15-902
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.1053 OF 2015
Ultratech Cement Ltd. ….Petitioner
V/s.
Silvex Constructions Private Limited ....Respondent
Adv.Trupti Surve i/by Adv.Sahil Mahajan for the petitioner.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 22.1.2016
P.C.:-
1 The parties have entered into consent terms dated 19.1.2016. The consent terms signed by the authorized signatory of the petitioner, the authorized signatory of the respondent and the Advocate for the petitioner is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2 The petition is disposed in terms of the consent terms.
(K.R.SHRIRAM,J)
KJ
CP1053.15-902
2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
KJ
Ultratech Cement Ltd.
Silvex Constructions Private Limited
K.R. Shriram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
