Dismissed

Anil S/O Shyamsunder Agre v. Shri. Sharadprasad Yadav, Commissioner of Police, Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC11 Jul 2016CP/100/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Contempt Petition, the High Court Bench directed the petitioner to substantiate claims of violation by providing data showing repeat violations by vehicle owners, enabling State officers to take prompt action.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to collect data showing repeat violations of Court orders by vehicle owners. The respondents are directed to take prompt action if such data is placed before them.

Anil S/O Shyamsunder Agre Vs Shri. Sharadprasad Yadav… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1107cp100.16

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100 OF 2016 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.50 OF 2012

¶5

(Anil s/o Shamsunder Agre vs. Shri Shardaprasad Yadav, Commissioner of Police and another)

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶7

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner. Smt. B.H. Dangre, Government Pleader for respondents.

¶9

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

¶10

DATED : JULY 11, 2016

¶11

Heard for some time.

¶12

Effort of Adv. Bhandarkar for petitioner is to demonstrate violation of Court's orders.

¶13

Smt. Dangre, learned Government Pleader has pointed out that in most of the cases, action in accordance with law has been taken.

¶14

After hearing respective Counsel, we find that there are some Transport Offices in the area and those transporters or vehicles coming to their offices/ garages violate Court's orders.

¶15

Thus, merely by demonstrating that a vehicle is parked, though violation of Court's orders

¶16

1107cp100.16

¶17

2/2

¶18

may be demonstrated, it may not be possible to reach real culprit.

¶19

The petitioner, therefore, has to prepare a chart pointing out the various vehicles with their registration numbers and other details so that they can demonstrate the Court as also Officers of the State Government that vehicles of same owner were parked on more than one occasion and owners have been punished for violating parking law or for violating Court's orders.

¶20

The petitioner has to bring on record material showing that transporters, who are aware of Court's orders are not bothered about the same and permit the same to be violated. Hence, with liberty to petitioner to place before respondents such data for due evaluation and with direction to respondents to take prompt action if such data is placed before them, we dispose of the contempt petition. No costs.

¶21

JUDGE JUDGE

¶22

khj

Anil S/O Shyamsunder Agre v. Shri. Sharadprasad Yadav, Commissioner of Police, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil S/O Shyamsunder Agre v. Shri. Sharadprasad Yadav, Commissioner of Police, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Magaswargiya Sarvodaya Shikshan and Prashikshan Sanstha, Wardha through Its Secretary and Anothers Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Department of Urban Development, Mumbai and 2 Others

Vaidehi E-Link, Thr. Its Prop. Shri. Hemraj Umraoji Punekar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Ambazari, Nagpur and Another

Devananda Galomal Nichwani Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Jaripatka, Nagpur and Another

Sagar Sanghraj Gajbhiye Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary to Rural Development Department and 2 Others

Ku. Manisha D/O Narayan Dodake and Others Vs Smt. Sampada Mehta (Chief Executive Officer. Z.P. Gadchiroli) and Another

Adivasi Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Dhanapur, through Its President, Murlidhar Keshav Alam Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. Mantralaya and Others