The High Court of Bombay disposed of company appeals No. 65 and 69 of 2015 following the parties' arrival at consent terms, resulting in the disposal of the underlying company petition as well.
Company Appeal No. 65 of 2015 and Company Appeal No. 69 of 2015 are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-COAPP-65&69-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 65 OF 2015 WITH
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 69 OF 2015 IN
CLB COMPANY PETITION NO. 22 OF 2014
Mohan Mahavirprasad Shah …Appellant Versus Indian Silk Mfg. Co.Private Limited & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Kiran Kulkarni, with Ms. K. Padmashri, i/b Kulkarni & Associates, for the Appellant in COAPP/65/2015 & for the Respondent in COAPP/69/2015.
Mr. Nitesh Menon, i/b I.R. Joshi & Co., for Respondents in COAPP/65/2015 & for the Appellant in COAPP/69/2015.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATE : 29th August 2016
P.C. :
1. Parties have arrived at Consent Terms. Learned
Counsel for the parties tender the Consent Terms signed by all the
parties and their Advocates. Parties are present in Court. In view of
the Consent Terms, Company Appeals do not survive. In view of Sharayu . 1 / 2
9-COAPP-65&69-15.doc
these Consent Terms, Company Appeal No. 65 of 2016 and Company Appeal No. 69 of 2016 are disposed of.
[A.K. MENON, J.]
Sharayu . 2 / 2
Mohan Mahavirprasad Shah
Indian Silk Mfg. Co.Private Limited
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
