Application to implead applicant as respondent was dismissed as he was not a proper party. Order subsequently allowed withdrawal and disposed of the Chamber Summon.
Chamber Summons dismissed; leave for withdrawal granted; order disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
(CHSW 88 of 2016)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 88 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION No. 839 OF 2016
Salim Mohammed Shaikh ….Applicant
In the matter between
M/s. Raj Enterprises ….Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Pradeep Thorat for Petitioner
Mr. Shobha Ajitkumar for respondent -BMC
Mr. Prayag Joshi i/b. Mr. Bipin Joshi for Applicant in CHS No. 88 of 2016 ******
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
M.S. KARNIK , JJ.
DATE : APRIL 6, 2016
P.C. :
direction, directing the Petitioner to implead the him as Party Respondent in
the petition. It is not disputed that the Applicant is not an aggrieved person.
Moreover, the Applicant has already filed a separate writ petition.
2/2
(CHSW 88 of 2016)
submits that the application for intervention has been put up by his rival
Opponent. It is submitted that the applicant is working with him and he is an employee of the Opponent, which is a rival contractor.
M.S.KARNIK, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Chamber Summon filed by the applicant to implead himself as a respondent is maintainable.
Salim Mohammed Shaikh
M/s. Raj Enterprises
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
