Disposed
Shyam Chandrakant Patade v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors. and Digamber Raghunath Mungekar and 2 Ors. (Applicants)
Bombay HCCHSW/256/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chswl-101.15 in wpl-1680.13
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMON (L.) NO.101 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION (L.) NO.1680 OF 2013
Digamber Reghunath Mungekar and Ors. … Applicants In the matter between Shannodevi Chourasiya … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Girish Godbole a/w Mr. Y.R. Shah for the Applicants. Mr. S.G. Deshmukh a/w Mr. Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anurag Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent No.1 – State. Mrs. Geeta Joglekar for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – BMC.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C.
. In view of the orders passed in PIL No.134 of 2009, the
Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequential amendments shall be carried out by the Petitioner within a period of four weeks from today.
1 of 1
Digamber Reghunath Mungekar and Ors.
Shannodevi Chourasiya
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court