Allowed
Satvik Rajiv Samani and Another v. Smt. Shardaben Prabhudas Samani and Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/396/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
940-CHS396-16.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 396 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO. 353 OF 2014
Satvik Rajiv Samani & Another…Plaintiffs
Versus
Smt. Shardaben Prabhudas Samani & Others…Defendants
Mr. Tushar Gujjar, i/b Solicis Lex, for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Shilpan Gaonkar, with Ms. Ankita Chandel, i/b Kurdukar
Associates, for Respondent No. 2.
Ms. Subhasree Chatterjee, with Mr. Sunil Trilokchandani, i/b M/s.
Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., for Defendant No. 9.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 21st September 2016
PC:-
1.For the reasons set out in the Affidavit in Support, the
Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Amendment to be carried out, without need of reverification, on or
before 7th October 2016. A copy of the amended Plaint is to be
served within one week thereafter.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
21st September 2016
Satvik Rajiv Samani & Another
Smt. Shardaben Prabhudas Samani & Others
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court