The High Court of Bombay disposed of Civil Application No. 711 of 2016 based on the consent minutes signed by advocates of the applicant and respondent No.5, after the applicant appeared and undertook to sign in court.
Civil Application disposed of in terms of the minutes of the consent order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
904-caw-711-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 711 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2016
Mr. Omprakash D. Pathak .. Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Ms Savina Bangera i/b Mr. Anil Mishra for the Applicant. Ms M.S. Bane, B-Panel Counsel for the State- Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Hemant Mehta i/b Mehta and Co for Respondent No.5. Mr. G.B. Walawalkar i/b Mr. S.P. Thoarat for Respondent No.8.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 07 JULY 2016.
P.C. :-
1] The learned counsel for the parties hand in minutes of the consent order, which is marked as ' X ' for purposes of identification. The minutes are signed by the Advocate for the applicant as well as advocate for respondent No.5. The two advocates represent the contesting parties. Mr Omprakash Pathak, the applicant is present in the Court and he also undertakes to put his signature to the minutes in presence of the Court. Accordingly, Civil Application is disposed of in terms of the minutes of the consent order.
2] The undertakings given by the parties are accepted as undertakings to this Court.
1/2
DSS
904-caw-711-16
order.
dinesh
2/2
Mr. Omprakash D. Pathak
The State of Maharashtra
or.
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
