The court clarified that a self-explanatory order regarding maintenance and electricity charges requires no modification. The civil application was disposed of without further details on reimbursement.
Civil application disposed of on clarification that order is self-explanatory regarding reimbursement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW. 600-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 600 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION No. 9 OF 2011
Dr. Dilip Dnyandev Pawar & Anr. … Applicants / Petitioners Vs.
Balbhim Gyanba Shinde & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sanjeev P. Kadam, for the Applicants / Petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat, for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, J.
DATE : APRIL 7, 2016 (At 2.35 p. m. in Chamber)
PC.
. The clarification / modification sought by the Applicants is not necessary, since the order is self-explanatory. So far as reimbursement part is concerned, it obviously means that the actual amount paid by the Petitioners towards the maintenance and electricity charges. Civil application is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
[V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Dr. Dilip Dnyandev Pawar & Anr.
Balbhim Gyanba Shinde & Ors.
V. M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
