On March 1, 2016, a single-judge bench disposed of a civil application arising from a writ petition, granting leave to amend arguments within two weeks while noting objections regarding alternate remedies.
Leave to amend granted within two weeks; order otherwise discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
p-15-caw- 567-16 in wp-11474-14.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 567 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11474 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearance, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.
Registrar's orders.
Mr. Dinesh Jain for the Applicant-Petitioner.
Ms Aparna Vhatkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Bhupesh V. Samant for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 1 MARCH 2016.
P.C. :-
3] Leave to amend is granted Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Amended copy to be served upon the learned counsel for the Respondents as well as the newly added parties.
4] However,, it is made clear that aforesaid is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the Respondents to raise all permissible objections, including the objection that the Petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy in the matter.
5] Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Dinesh Jain
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Respondent No.3
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
