Allowed

Shantilal Keshavlal Shah and Ors. v. the Principal Secretary - Government of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Jan 2016CAW/3096/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed the Civil Application. The court noted that notices to the legal representatives of deceased respondents were duly served but no reply was filed, leading to the application's allowance and an order for amendment within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within four weeks.

Shantilal Keshavlal Shah and Ors. Vs the Principal… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

caw-3096.12

¶3

ash

¶4

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3096 OF 2012 IN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.8006 OF 2008

¶7

Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.

¶8

Shri Nitin Mulye for the Applicants. Shri V.S. Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶9

CORAM : A.S. OKA & C.V. BHADANG, JJ DATED : 13TH JANUARY 2016

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

. Office remark shows that the notices of the proposed legal representatives of the deceased Respondent Nos.6 and 26 have been duly served with the notices. There is no reply filed by the said legal representatives. Hence, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) to (c). Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

(C.V. BHADANG, J) (A.S.OKA, J)

Shantilal Keshavlal Shah and Ors. v. the Principal Secretary - Government of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shantilal Keshavlal Shah and Ors. v. the Principal Secretary - Government of Maharashtra Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdeep Singh Chandhok Vs Mumbai Municipal Corporation and 7 Ors.

Madhukar Narayan Suryavanshi Vs Office of the Hon'Ble Chief Minister, Maharashtra and Ors.

Mr. Vijay Kashiram Kadam through Tukaram Kadam and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Gulam Mohammed Nazim Zakeriya and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Revenue and Forest Dept. and Anr.

Janata Hill S.R.A Co-Operative Housing Soc Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

Shri. Mahadeo Harishchandra Dhavale and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.