Indian context Party applied for an extension of time. Court was unsatisfied with reasons but extended time in interest of justice; Civil Application disposed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
2312caw2715.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
C.A.W.NO. 2715/2016 IN W.P.NO. 5462/2014.
Magaswargiya Survodaya Shikahan Sanstha, Wardha and another.
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 23, 2016.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
reason given, in the interest of justice, we extend the time as prayed for. Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Magaswargiya Survodaya Shikahan Sanstha
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
