The High Court extended protection granted to applicants for two weeks instead of the sought six weeks. The civil applications were disposed of.
Extension of protection granted for two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAW2559-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Civil Application No. (CAW) 2559/2016
in
Writ Petition No.1395/2016 (Shriram Trimbak Joshi and others. vs. State of Maharashtra and ors) and
Civil Application No. (CAW) 2551/2016 in
Writ Petition No.5056/2016 (Ataur Rahman Khan s/o Zulfi Quar Khan and ors. .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. R.R. Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants in CAW 2559/16 Mr. M.V. Samarth, Advocate for Applicants in CAW 2551/16. Mrs. B.H. Dangre, Government Pleader for Respondents/State Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for Respondent/N.M.C. Nagpur.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : December 01, 2016.
This is an application for extension of the protection which was granted by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2016.
The learned counsel appearing for the applicants fairly states that though extension is sought for six weeks, they are requesting extension only for two weeks.
Taking into consideration that the request is reasonable, the period is extended by two weeks. Civil Applications stand disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
2 CAW2559-16.odt
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
