The Court allowed a civil application for condonation of delay and restoration of a writ petition, directing the respondents to remove office objections within four weeks.
Condonation of delay; restoration of Writ Petition (ST) No. 11440 of 2015 to original number; respondents to remove office objections within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-caw-2337.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2337 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 11440 OF 2015
Mohammad Ayub Peer Mohd.
… Applicant
Versus
Malegaon Municipal Corporation and Ors.
… Respondents
Ms. A.M. Ansari for the Applicant.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 22, 2016.
P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant on Civil Application.
For the reasons stated in the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay, we are satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing of the application within time. In the circumstances, the delay in filing the application is condoned. We have also considered merits of the application. We find that the applicant has satisfactorily explained the reasons in not removing the office objections within time. In the circumstances, we allow the application. Writ petition is ordered to be restored to its original number. Office objections be removed within four weeks. Civil Application is disposed of.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay is warranted in filing the civil application.
Whether merit warrants restoration of the writ petition to original number.
Mohammad Ayub Peer Mohd.
Malegaon Municipal Corporation
Shantanu Kemkar
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
