Single judge permitted amendment to civil application no. 2162 of 2015 concerning writ petition no. 9044 of 2005 without admitting averments and directed listing for final hearing.
Application allowed to carry out amendment; petition listed for final hearing after amendment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2162 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9044 OF 2005
Meenakshi Balmukund Chaudhari
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Appearances Mr. Ajinkya Palav i/by Mrs. Varsha Palav Advocate for the Applicant Mr. A.I. Patel Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 4 to 7 / State
CORAM : D.H. WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2016.
P.C.:
learned AGP has no objection to carry out amendment in the
petition. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
duly carried out, for final hearing in due course.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] [ CHIEF JUSTICE ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 1
Meenakshi Balmukund Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra
D.H. Waghela
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
