Allowed

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Jul 2016CAW/1761/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed Civil Application No. 1761 of 2013 to recall and set aside an order dismissing a petition for non-prosecution due to delayed payment of bhatta. Consequently, the court allowed Civil Application No. 1827 of 2013 to stay the execution of a Recovery Certificate, as the underlying writ petition was restored to file.

What did the court decide?

The order of dismissal dated 26 August 2011 was recalled and set aside, and the petition was restored to file. The execution of the Recovery Certificate was stayed.

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2016)

caw 1761-2013.doc

1/2

sat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1761 OF 2013 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1827 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10021 OF 2010

¶6

WITH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 4475 OF 2000

¶8

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ...Petitioner / Applicant vs. Namdeo Ranoji Khapare & Ors. ....Respondents

¶9

Mr.Ashish Gaikwad for Applicant. Ms.Anjali N. Helekar for Respondent Nos.2 to 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14.

¶10

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

¶11

19 JULY 2016

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Civil Application No.1761 of 2013 prays for recall and setting aside of an order dated 26 August 2011 passed by the Registrar (Judl-1). By the impugned order, which is a self operative order, the Registrar dismissed the petition for non-prosecution by non-payment of bhatta within the stipulated period. The Petitioner has explained the circumstances in which the bhatta was not paid. The civil application is allowed and the order of dismissal dated 26 August 2011 is recalled and set aside and the petition is restored to file.

¶14

2 Civil Application No.1827 of 2013 seeks stay of the execution of a Recovery Certificate dated 26 July 2013 passed by the Tahsildar in the proceedings arising out of Writ Petition No.10021 of 2010. In the original petition, namely, Writ Petition No.10021 of 2010, at the time of issuance of rule, there was

¶15

caw 1761-2013.doc

¶16

sat 2/2

¶17

an interim order in terms of prayer clause (b), which stayed the implementation of the original order dated 31 March 2010, in pursuance of which the impugned Recovery Certificate was issued. Since the petition, namely, Writ Petition No.10021 of 2010, is restored to file along with the interim relief granted in the petition, the civil application for stay of implementation of the Recovery Certificate will have to be allowed. Accordingly, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶18

3 Writ Petition No.10021 of 2010 along with Writ Petition No.4475 of 2000 to come up for final hearing on 4 August 2016.

¶19

(S.C. Gupte, J.)

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnan Gopala Vishwanath Vs Maratha Sahakari Bank Ltd. and 10 Ors.

M/S. Lakdawala Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and 44 Ors.

Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs Shri. Sanjay Ram Ambre and Ors.

Rajaram Sitaram Mane Vs Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co.Ltd. and Anr.

Bhaskar Mahadu Borse and Anr. Vs the Secretary, General Admn. Dept. and Ors.

Vasantdada Sugar Institute Vs Shri. Satish N More and Ors.