The High Court at Nagpur, upon representation that service of the petitioner is at stake, granted a minimum time extension by three months as the last chance.
Time extended by three months to serve the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw1431.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1431 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4751 OF 2015 (D) Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Israeel
..vs..
The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and ors
....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's Order
Shri N.R. Patil, AGP for the applicant/Resp.2. Shri R.J. Mirza, counsel for the petitioner.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. I.K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : JULY 14, 2016.
Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader
Shri N.R. Patil for the applicant/respondent No.2 and learned counsel Shri R.J. Mirza for the petitioner.
Learned counsel Shri R.J. Mirza for the petitioner, upon instructions, states that in the facts pointed out to this Court, minimum extension may be allowed as service of the petitioner is at stake.
In this situation, we extend time by three months from today, as last chance.
JUDGE JUDGE
!! BRW !!
...../-
Shaikh Irfan Shaikh Israeel
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
I.K. JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
