The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the Civil Application as infructuous because the period for which extension was sought had already expired.
Civil Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-caw-1220.2015.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1220 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12034 OF 2012
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
… Applicants
Versus
Shivanand Haribhau Ahire and anr.
… Respondents
Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the applicants.
Mr. C.K. Bhangoji i/by Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the respondents.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2016.
P.C.
We find that the relief claimed in the Civil Application can not now be granted as the period for which extension has been sought has already expired. In the result, Civil Application is dismissed as infructuous.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
Shivanand Haribhau Ahire and anr.
PRAKASH D. NAIK
SHANTANU KEMKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
