This order disposes the civil application for lack of prosecution as no instructions were received from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW 1217-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1217 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016
Smt. Rajani Gajanan Kamble .. Petitioner V/s Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Gauri Jadhav for the petitioner.
Mr. Rui Rodriques with Mr. M.S. Bhardwaj for respondents nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : D.H. WAGHELA, CJ. & M.S. SONAK, J. DATE : 29th MARCH 2016
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has taken away papers from them and they have not received any further instructions. Therefore, the application is disposed for want of prosecution, with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
ABS
Smt. Rajani Gajanan Kamble
Union of India
D.H. WAGHELA
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
