A single-judge split bench of the Bombay High Court disposed of a civil application filed in connection with a writ petition concerning agriculture produce market matters, directing necessary amendments.
Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of as such with direction to carry out necessary amendments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw 1056.16
Sr.No.25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1056 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3501 OF 2016
Anant Rambhao Jadhav and ors. ...Applicants In the matter of : Dnyaneshwar Baliram Thakre ..Petitioner Versus Agriculture Produce Market and ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Kirit J. Hakani, advocate for the applicants as well as respondents. Mr. Abhijit Purushottam Kulkarni, advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
RANJIT MORE, J J.
DATE : 25th APRIL, 2016.
P. C. :
Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Anant Rambhao Jadhav and ors.
Dnyaneshwar Baliram Thakre
Agriculture Produce Market and ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
