During hearing in a Civil Application concerning PIL No. 16/2016, the High Court allowed the petition and extended the stipulated period by six months.
Extension of period by six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAO889-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Civil Application (CAO) No. 889 of 2016 in PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.16/2016
(Sarangsing s/o Shivdassing Chavan .vs. State of Maharashtra and others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.S. Dhengale, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. S.S. Jachak, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4/Applicants.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi, JJ. DATED : May 05, 2016.
For the reasons stated, Civil Application No. 889 of 2016 is allowed. The period is extended by six months.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the extension of time period of six months for filing applications in PIL No. 16/2016 could be granted.
Sarangsing s/o Shivdassing Chavan
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
