A single-judge Bench allowed a Civil Application seeking to set aside a conditional order passed by the Registrar, holding that the averments in the Application made out a case for such relief.
The Civil Application was allowed to set aside the conditional order passed by the Registrar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cao-32.16
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.19818 OF 2015 IN REVIEW PETITION ST. NO.19816 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4683 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Nitin P. Deshpande, AGP for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & C.V. BHADANG, JJ DATED : 1ST MARCH 2016
P.C.:
. Heard the learned AGP for the Applicant. In
view of the averments made in the Application, a case is made out for setting aside the conditional order passed by the Registrar (Judicial-I). Accordingly, the Application is allowed.
(C.V. BHADANG, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a case is made out for setting aside the conditional order passed by the Registrar.
Whether the Civil Application should be allowed based on the averments made.
Whether the conditional order by the Registrar needs to be set aside.
Applicant
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court