The Bombay High Court held that prayers in this civil application cannot be entertained against a disposed Family Court Appeal. The applicant is directed to approach substantive proceedings.
Disposed with liberty to the applicant to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cam57
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.57 OF 2016 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.68 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Ms Rajashree Gurav for the Applicant
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
G.S.KULKARNI,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 11, 2016.
P.C.:
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1Perused the prayers made in the
civil application. The said prayers
cannot be sought in a disposed of
Family Court Appeal. The Family Court
Appeal was directed against the order
made by the Principal Judge of the
Family Court rejecting the application
for transfer. Therefore, the reliefs
which are sought in this application
will have to be sought by way of
substantive proceedings in accordance
with law.
2Hence, we dispose of the civil
2 cam57 application with liberty to the applicant to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
(G.S.KULKARNI,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the reliefs sought in the civil application are maintainable against a disposed Family Court Appeal.
Ms Rajashree Gurav
Respondent
A.S. Oka
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court