The court allowed the civil application and restored the Family Court Appeal No. 212 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 334 of 2013 to file.
Civil Application allowed; Family Court Appeal No. 212 of 2013 and Civil Application No. 334 of 2013 restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 cam-54-16
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 334OF 2013 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 212 OF 2013 IN
PETITION NO. 75 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Aparna Deokar for applicant.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A. A. SAYED, JJ .
March 02, 2016.
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the objections are complied with and she undertakes to remove office object, if any. It is submitted that service is completed. The counsel seeks restoration of appeal as well as Civil Application for injunction by setting aside the order of the Registrar (Judicial) dated 11/12/2015 and 18/2/2016.
2/2 cam-54-16
For the aforesaid reasons, Civil Application is allowed and the Family Court Appeal No. 212 of 2013 along with Civil Application No. 334 of 2013 is restored to file.
(A. A. SAYED , J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
APPLICANT
NARESH H. PATIL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
