Partly allowed

Sou. Rani Sachin Zambare v. Mr. Sachin Chandrahas Zambare

Bombay HC9 Dec 2016CAM/4/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This civil appeal arises from a decree of judicial separation passed by the Family Court. The appellant-wife challenged the decree. The High Court allowed the appeal, stayed the decree's effect, and disposed of the application as the appeal was already admitted.

What did the court decide?

Stay of the effect and operation of the impugned Family Court decree of judicial separation till the final disposal of the appeal.

Sou. Rani Sachin Zambare Vs Mr. Sachin Chandrahas… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2016)

cam4

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.4 OF 2015

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Priyal Sarda for the Applicant Appellant
None for the Respondent.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &

¶10

SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2016

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1None appears for the respondent.
Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant. The applicant is the
appellant in the Family Court Appeal
(FCA). The applicant-wife has
preferred FCA for challenging the
decree passed by the Family Court in a
petition filed by the respondent-
husband. If the paragraph 14 read with
clause 2 of the operative part of the
decree is perused, it is crystal clear
that the impugned decree is of judicial
separation.

¶13

2Prayer clause (a) is for stay of

¶14

2 cam4

¶15

execution of the said decree. Prayer
clauses (b) and(c) are for interim
relief pending this application.

¶16

3As the appeal has been already
admitted, the effect and operation of
the impugned decree have to be stayed
till the disposal of the appeal. Hence,
we direct that till the final disposal
of the appeal, effect and operation of
the impugned decree shall remained
stayed. Civil application is disposed
of.

¶17

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Sou. Rani Sachin Zambare v. Mr. Sachin Chandrahas Zambare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sou. Rani Sachin Zambare v. Mr. Sachin Chandrahas Zambare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ismail Musabhai Bilakhiya Vs the General Manager and Anr.

Sayyed Mumtax Ahmed Abdul Rzzak Vs Shivshakti Shree Swami Samarth Chs (Prop.) through Its Honory Secretary and 2 Ors.

M/S Siddhi Tradematrix Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sou. Rani Sachin Zambare Vs Mr. Sachin Chandrahas Zambare

Prakash Ragho Bachchhav Vs the Principal, Sahyadri College of Arts and Commerce and Ors.

Prakash Ragho Bachchhav Vs the Principal, Sahyadri College of Arts and Commerce and Ors.