The High Court dismissed an application seeking expedited hearing of a Family Court Appeal pending since 2011, holding that priority could not be given over appeals from 2008 onwards.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam169
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2016 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.99 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Ms Anjali Purav Yajurvedi for the Applicant
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : JULY 13, 2016
P.C.
1The Family Court Appeals from the
year 2008 onwards are awaiting final
hearing. Therefore, as of today,
priority cannot be given to the hearing
of the Family Court Appeal of 2011.
Hence, application for expediting
hearing is rejected.
(A.A.SAYED,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant's prayer for expediting the hearing of the pending Family Court Appeal should be allowed.
Ms Anjali Purav Yajurvedi
Respondent
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court