Condonation of delay. The High Court allowed two civil applications in a Family Court appeal matter after conducting a hearing and finding the cause of delay satisfactorily explained. The specific relief sought in the applications is not detailed in the operative portion provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam141.15-154.15.15.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 141 OF 2015 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST)NO. 9265 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 154 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST)NO. 9758 OF 2015
Mr. Jayesh Pandhari Keni ... Appellant
V/s.
Smt. Shilpa Jayesh Keni ... Respondent
Mr. Chetan Agrawal for the applicants Mr. Devang H. Shah for the respondents in both applications.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ .
8th January, 2016 .
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the applications. Cause of delay is satisfactorily explained. For the reasons stated in the application, both the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned.
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Mr. Jayesh Pandhari Keni
Smt. Shilpa Jayesh Keni
NARESH H. PATIL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
