This court addressed the issue of condonation of delay for a civil application. Since the respondent failed to appear or issue was refused, the court allowed the concession of the delay of 37 days.
The delay of 37 days was condoned and the rule was made absolute in prayer Clause (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam-124-15.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.8918 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Chaitrali Deshmukh i/b. Mr. I. M. Khairdi, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND P.D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 6, 2016.
P.C.
Office remark records that notice has
been refused by the respondent. No appears for the respondent. Sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 37 days. Rule is made absolute in prayer Clause (b).
(P.D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Applicant/Appellant
Respondent
A.S. OKA
P.D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
