Disposed
Ashish Ashokrao Dhankikar v. Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari
Bombay HCCAI/112/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2015 Vat IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
CAI 112of 2015
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 112 OF 2015 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 80 OF 2015
Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari ….Petitioner Vs. The Union of India and Anr. ….Respondent
And
Ashish Ashokrao Dhankikar ….Applicant/ Intervenor
None for the Petitioner
Mr. Aparna Whatkar -AGP for the State Mr. G. Hariharan a/w. Mr. D.N. Mishra i/b.Mr.A.A. Ansari for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2016
P.C. :
Civil Application for Intervention is allowed. Intervention
application to be heard along with the main PIL. Stand over to 25.10.2016.
Mrs.SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Mr. Shahed Ali Inayat Ali Ansari
The Union of India
Ashish Ashokrao Dhankikar
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court