The court examined submissions regarding delay in a civil appeal. It found sufficient cause to condone the delay and ordered the condonation of delay permitting the appeal to proceed.
Delay is condoned and the civil application is allowed with a direction to place the appeal on 29th February 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf84
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.84 OF 2016
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2016 IN
FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.24778 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Dilip Shinde a/w Mr.A.Nair i/b Kiddharth Kanakia
for the Applicant
Mr.A.M.Kulkarni i/b Mr.Akshay Shinde for the
Respondent Nos.1,3 to 5.
Mr.G.S.Godbole for respondent No.2
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
C.V.BHADANG,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 20, 2016.
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
applicant. Time is sought by the
learned counsel for the respondent
No.4 to file a reply. We have heard
the learned counsel for the respondent
Nos.1,3 to 5 and the learned counsel
for the respondent No.2. The
submission of the learned counsel for
the respondents is that there is no
sufficient cause made out. We have
perused the averments made in the
application. There is sufficient cause
made out to condone the delay.
2 caf84
Accordingly, delay is condoned. Civil
application is allowed. Place the
appeal on 29th February 2016 under the
caption of `Fresh Matters'.
(C.V.BHADANG,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is sufficient cause for condoning the delay in filing the appeal.
Whether the civil application for condonation of delay should be allowed.
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
Respondent No.3
Respondent No.4
Respondent No.5
A.S.Oka
C.V.Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court