Disposed

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya and Ors.

Bombay HC30 Nov 2016CAF/2652/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of two civil applications: one by applicants (widow and senior citizen parents) seeking withdrawal of a deposited tribunal award, and another by an insurance company seeking a stay on judgment execution. The Court allowed withdrawal of specified amounts for the applicants subject to filing an undertaking, which dispensed with the stay request.

What did the court decide?

Applicants permitted to withdraw Rs.6,00,000, Rs.30,000, Rs.2,00,000, and accrued interest subject to undertaking; stay application disposed of accordingly.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt. Rita Ramesh… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

prdn47caf4741-16.sxw

Pvr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

Civil Application NO. 4741 OF 2016 IN First Appeal (ST) NO. 3122 OF 2016

¶7

Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya And Ors. ...Applicants

¶8

In the matter between M/s. New India Assurance Company Ltd. ...Appellant vs. Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya And Ors. ...Respondents

¶9

WITH Civil Application NO. 2652 OF 2016 IN First Appeal (ST) NO. 3122 OF 2016

¶10

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...Applicant Versus Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya And Ors. ...Respondents

¶11

Mr.Milind V. More, for the Appellant.

¶12

Mr.Vilas Ramchandra More, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶13

CORAM: G.S.KULKARNI, J.

¶14

DATE: 30^th NOVEMBER,2016 ---

¶15

P.C. :-

¶16

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants (orig.Respondents-Claimants) and the learned Counsel for the respondent (original appellant-Insurance Company).

¶17

Pvr 2 prdn47caf4741-16.sxw

¶18

By Civil application No.4741 of 2016 the applicants (original claimants) are seeking withdrawal of the amount of compensation as awarded by the Tribunal and deposited by the respondents before the Trial Court in pursuance of the order dated 21 June 2016 of this Court. The applicant no.1 is a widow, applicant no.2 is a father who is aged about 74 years, applicant no.3 is the mother who is also 69 years of age. Both applicant nos.2 and 3 are senior citizens. Applicant Nos.4,5 and 6 are minor-the children of the deceased.

¶19

Civil Application No.2652 of 2016 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant – New India Assurance Co.Ltd. seeking a stay on the execution of the judgment and order dated 12 December 2014 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Vasai in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.106 of 2012. The learned counsel for the Applicant states that the award amount as directed in the impugned judgment and award has already been deposited before the Tribunal and therefore the impugned judgment and award deserves to be stayed.

¶20

As Civil Application No.4741 of 2016 has been filed by the Respondents seeking withdrawal of the said amount

¶21

3 prdn47caf4741-16.sxw

¶22

Pvr

¶23

which is deposited both these Civil Applications are heard together.

¶24

Perused the averments as made in the civil application No.4741 of 2016. Though the prayers as made in the said civil application are for a blanket withdrawal of Rs.37,33,342/- as awarded by the Tribunal, considering the nature of the order passed by the learned Member of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the said prayers can be molded to consider the directions as contained in paragraph 5(a), (b) and (c) of the operative order of the judgment, as in paragraph 5(d) of the order the learned Member of MACT has directed that an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- each be deposited in fixed deposit in any of the nationalised bank in the name of the minors namely applicant Nos.4 to 6 who are under the guardianship of applicant No.1 and with right to collect the quarterly interest thereon, till they attains majority.

¶25

Considering the nature of the liabilities and the expenditure which are required to be incurred by the Applicant Nos.1 to 3, at this stage it would be appropriate and in the interest of justice that the Applicants are permitted to withdraw

¶26

Pvr 4

¶27

prdn47caf4741-16.sxw

¶28

the amount as specified in paragraphs 5(a), (b) and (c) namely Rs.6,00,000/-, Rs.30,000/- and Rs.2,00,000/- alongwith the proportionate accrued interest at the time of deposit before the Tribunal and the further interest accrued thereon till date, subject to the Applicants filing an usual undertaking in this Court within a period of two weeks from today.

¶29

In the circumstances, as the Respondents are permitted to withdraw the amount as observed above, the learned Counsel for the Respondents (claimants) makes a statement that at this stage the Respondents would not initiate any proceedings for execution of the impugned judgment and award, without leave of the Court.

¶30

Civil Application No.2652 of 2016 and Civil Application No.4741 of 2016 are disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Rita Ramesh Uphadhaya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Ravindran Pillai Vs Dinesh Mahadev Munge and Anr.

Shahabuddin Mohammad Nazir Khan Vs M/S. Navkar Infra Projects and Ors.

Shahabuddin Mohammad Nazir Khan Vs M/S. Navkar Infra Projects and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra through the Executive Engineer Vs Sumanbai Popatrao Tile

Namdeo Shamrao Shinde Deceased through Lrs.and Legal Representatives Smt. Pushpa Namdeo Shinde and Vs Mohd. Yusuf S. Bombaywala and Anr.

Miss. Inchanany Nymphy Jose(Deceased) Lrs. Mr. Enchanany Augusthy Joseph and Anr. Vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.